The Rajabai Tower is a clock tower in Mumbai, India, standing within the Fort campus of the University of Mumbai. It rises to a height of 85 meters and forms part of the Victorian and Art Deco Ensemble of Mumbai, which was added to the list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites in 2018.
Facts
Building TypeSourced to the subject's own account LocationSourced to the subject's own accountMumbai City district, India 2 Completed YearSourced to the subject's own account Height (m)Sourced to the subject's own account Classification
Standing StatusSourced to the subject's own account Building Type
Building Type (category)Sourced to the subject's own account Connections
Has Building Type
In Style
Source Rajabai Clock Tower (Wikipedia)
Uses Element
Source Rajabai Clock Tower (Wikipedia)
Source Rajabai Clock Tower (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Located In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is located.
Source Rajabai Clock Tower (Wikipedia)tier 3
Sources
1. Rajabai Clock Tower (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationLead section
The Rajabai Tower is a clock tower in Mumbai, India. It is in the confines of the Fort campus of the University of Mumbai.
Infobox: building_type
Clock tower
- In Style: Gothic Architecture, infobox architectural_style field: Venetian and Gothic
Uses Element: Stone, Article text
It is built out of the locally available buff coloured Kurla stone.
Uses Element: Stained Glass, Article text
The tower has one of the best stained glass windows in the city.
View the Source 2. Rajabai Clock Tower (Wikidata)
Wikimedia FoundationWikidata date-of-opening/inception statement (1878)
Wikidata item Q7285587, property P571: 1878
Wikidata height (P2048) statement: 85.34
Wikidata item Q7285587, property P2048 (height): 85.34 m (converted to metres, preferred/normal rank, non-deprecated)
Wikidata located-in-admin-entity (P131) / country (P17) statement: Mumbai City district, India
Wikidata item Q7285587, property P131/P17 (location): Mumbai City district, India
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.