The Willy Nelle Villa is an eclectic villa at 3 Słowackiego Street in the Niebuszewo-Bolinko district of Szczecin, Poland, built in 1880 for developer Emil Otto. The three-story building combines eclectic and Renaissance Revival elements, with an ornate facade carrying Ionic and Corinthian engaged columns and acanthus-leaf decoration, and an interior ceiling painted with Bacchanalia scenes. Damaged by a fallen roof in October 2017, it was restored between March 2018 and April 2020, and it has held protected cultural property status in Poland since 1997.
Facts
Building TypeSourced to the subject's own account LocationSourced to the subject's own account Completed Year Classification
Standing Status Building Type
Building Type (category)Sourced to the subject's own account Connections
Has Building Type
In Style
Source Willy Nelle Villa (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Located In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is located.
Source Willy Nelle Villa (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Willy Nelle Villa (Wikipedia)
Lead section
Willy Nelle Villa (German pronunciation: [ˈvɪ.li ˈneː.lə]; Polish: Willa Willy'ego Nellego; German: Willy-Nelles-Villa) is an eclectic villa in Szczecin, Poland, placed at 3 Słowackiego Street, within the neighbourhood of Niebuszewo-Bolinko.
Infobox: completion_date
1880
- In Style: Renaissance Revival architecture, infobox architectural_style field: Eclecticism, Renaissance Revival
View the Source2. Willy Nelle Villa (Wikidata)
Wikimedia FoundationWikidata instance-of (P31) statement (Villa)Quote, Wikidata instance-of (P31) statement (Villa)
Wikidata item Q28673937, instance of (P31): villa
View the Source 3. Willy Nelle Villa (Wikidata)
Wikimedia FoundationWikidata located-in-admin-entity (P131) / country (P17) statement (EntityId 415849): Szczecin, PolandQuote, Wikidata located-in-admin-entity (P131) / country (P17) statement (EntityId 415849): Szczecin, Poland
Wikidata item Q28673937, property P131/P17 (location): Szczecin, Poland
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.