Garvergården is a half timbered building complex dating from around 1600, situated in Vestergade in Køge, Denmark. It was owned by shoemakers and tanners for nearly two hundred years, from 1732 until the early 1920s, and stands as testament to a period when Køge was a center for shoemaking and tanning. Both the building fronting the street and a side wing at its rear are listed structures. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Building TypeSourced to the subject's own account LocationSourced to the subject's own accountKøge Municipality, Denmark 3 Completed Year Classification
Standing Status Building Type
Building Type (category)Sourced to the subject's own account Connections
Has Building Type
Uses Element
Source Garvergården (Wikidata)
Additional Source Garvergården (Wikipedia)Wikipedia category: Timber framed buildings in Køge Municipality
In the Other Atlases
Located In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is located.
Source Garvergården (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Garvergården (Wikipedia)
Lead section
The building fronting the street and a side wing on its rear are listed.
Infobox: completion_date
1595-1699
Uses Element: Timber, Wikipedia category: Timber framed buildings in Køge Municipality
Category:Timber framed buildings in Køge Municipality
View the Source2. Garvergården (Wikidata)
Wikimedia FoundationWikidata instance-of (P31) statement (Timber-framed house)Quote, Wikidata instance-of (P31) statement (Timber-framed house)
Wikidata item Q26995988, instance of (P31): timber-framed house
3. Garvergården (Wikidata)
Wikimedia FoundationWikidata located-in-admin-entity (P131) / country (P17) statement (EntityId 391613): Køge Municipality, DenmarkQuote, Wikidata located-in-admin-entity (P131) / country (P17) statement (EntityId 391613): Køge Municipality, Denmark
Wikidata item Q26995988, property P131/P17 (location): Køge Municipality, Denmark
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.