The Hotel Haegumgang, originally the Four Seasons Barrier Reef Resort, was a floating hotel. It was originally designed to exploit the tourism potential of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, opening on 9 March 1988 and initially situated in the shallow John Brewer Reef, 70 kilometres northeast of Townsville.
Facts
Building Type LocationSourced to the subject's own accountKosong County, North Korea 2 Completed Year Classification
Standing Status Building Type
Building Type (category) Connections
Has Building Type
Entity-backed identity for the building-type enum value this building already carries, resolved to an architecture concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The building-type fact itself stays on the building unchanged.
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Hotel Haegumgang - Wikipedia
standing status determination, wikipedia summary
The hotel was demolished by the North Korean government on the orders of Kim Jong Un in March 2022.
Wikipedia infobox building_type field
The Hotel Haegumgang (Korean: 호텔해금강), originally the Four Seasons Barrier Reef Resort, was a floating hotel. Originally designed to exploit the tourism potential of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, the Four Seasons Barrier Reef Resort opened on 9 March 1988 and was initially situated in the shallow John Brewer Reef, 70 kilometres (43 miles) northeast of Townsville.
The floating hotel quickly p
View the Source2. Hotel Haegumgang (Wikidata)
Wikimedia FoundationWikidata date-of-opening/inception statement (1988)
Wikidata item Q19458926, property P1619: 1988
Wikidata located-in-admin-entity (P131) / country (P17) statement: Kosong County, North Korea
Wikidata item Q19458926, property P131/P17 (location): Kosong County, North Korea
View the Source 3. Wikidata: Hotel Haegumgang
- Wikidata Q19458926, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)
- Wikidata Q19458926, P571 claim (w-bbfill-artsarchag-0926)
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.