Architecture and Design Atlas

How Space Is Shaped
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Buildings and Structures

Matsumoto Castle

Fortifications and Military Architecture

Matsumoto Castle, originally known as Fukashi Castle, is a castle in the city of Matsumoto, Nagano Prefecture, Japan, ranked among the country's premier historic castles alongside Himeji and Kumamoto. It was the seat of the Matsumoto Domain under the Tokugawa shogunate of the Edo period.

Facts
Building Type
Castle 1
Location
Matsumoto, Nagano Prefecture, Japan 1
Completed Year
1594 1
Sources give the keep complete by 1593-94, in the late sixteenth century; no more precise single year is stated.
Classification
Standing Status
Standing 1
Building Type
Building Type (category)
Castle 1
Connections

Has Building Type

Castle, Concepts

In Style

A landmark of Japanese traditional architecture.

Uses Element

Source Wikipedia: Matsumoto Castle
Source Wikipedia: Matsumoto Castle
In the Other Atlases

Located In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is located.

Source Wikipedia: Matsumoto CastleLead paragraph of the cited Wikipedia article
Quote, Lead paragraph of the cited Wikipedia article
It is one of Japan's premier historic castles, along with Himeji and Kumamoto.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Matsumoto Castle
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section
    Matsumoto Castle is a flatland castle 平城 (hirajiro) because it is not built on a hilltop or amid rivers, but on a plain.
  • Lead section
    Matsumoto Castle (松本城, Matsumoto-jō), originally known as Fukashi Castle, is a castle in city of Matsumoto, Nagano Prefecture.
  • history section, keep construction
    It is believed much of the castle was completed by 1593-94.
  • Lead section
    It was the seat of Matsumoto Domain under the Edo Period Tokugawa shogunate.
  • Uses Element: Timber, infobox material field: Earth, stone, and wood
  • Uses Element: Stone, Infobox material field: Earth, stone, and wood
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.