A measure of how friendly an area is to walking, shaped by block size, street connectivity, mixed land use, sidewalk quality and perceived safety. It is a central goal of the New Urbanism and Fifteen-Minute City movements, offered as a counter to the car-dependent postwar suburban planning pattern.
Facts
Disputed
Formulated YearJane Jacobs's 1961 The Death and Life of Great American Cities supplied the conceptual groundwork but, per this source, never used the term walkability itself; this source dates the term's first repeated academic use to 2003. Domain
Domain (category) Concept Domain FAQs
Is walkability the same thing as the Fifteen-Minute City?
No. Walkability is a measure of how friendly an area is to walking; the Fifteen-Minute City is a specific planning concept that uses walkability as a means to keep daily needs within reach.
Walkability is a measure, shaped by factors such as block size, street connectivity, mixed land use, sidewalk quality and perceived safety, of how friendly a given area is to walking. The Fifteen-Minute City, introduced by the scientist and urbanist Carlos Moreno and adopted as policy in Paris under mayor Anne Hidalgo, is a specific urban planning concept built on that measure: it aims to put most daily needs, work, school, shopping, healthcare and leisure, within a fifteen minute walk or bicycle ride of home. Walkability is the underlying condition; the Fifteen-Minute City is one named policy framework for pursuing it at city scale.
Connections
Associated With
Walkability is the underlying quality the Fifteen-Minute City model is designed to maximize at neighborhood scale.
Source Wikipedia
Sources
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationWalkability, Etymology section
In 2003, the term walkability was repeatedly used in a frequently cited academic article: Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling.
- Wikipedia: Walkability
- In Category: Concepts
- Associated With: New Urbanism
- Associated With: The Fifteen-Minute City
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.